-
AuthorPosts
-
February 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM #7871info6Participant
Hello,
Should I be using the Vin to connect a 6.4V battery to the Mini Ultra Pro v2 or can I use the JST connector? In this case I won’t be trying to charge the batter through the built in charger.
February 12, 2018 at 9:28 AM #7877LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterHi!
The JST connector can only be used with Li-Ion or Li-Pol that has a maximum voltage of 4.2V and nominal voltage of 3.7 V. If you used it on VIN, then it is okay but it becomes the charging source in this case.
Do take note, when powering from VIN or VUSB, you won’t be getting the 18 uA of sleep current. Only when a valid Li-Ion/Pol is used on the JST connector, the desired 18 uA of sleep current can be achieved.
February 12, 2018 at 10:27 AM #7883info6ParticipantAh bummer. What sort of current draw can I expect?
My project is based on the code in this post: http://www.rocketscream.com/blog/docs-item/using-rtc-in-low-power-mode-on-mini-ultra-pro/ I would test it myself but I don’t have a multi-meter at the moment that can do micro or milli amp testing.
What advice do you have for minimizing power consumption when using the Vin? I need to use different batteries to deal with cold temps.
February 12, 2018 at 12:33 PM #7885LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterHi,
Using VIN, it will be 1.5 mA nominally with VIN at 6V. You can take a look at this section of the datasheet of the power path IC BQ24074. So, that’s the best you could get unfortunately.
Usually VIN is considered as the 2nd source of power like solar and DC voltage.
As more and more people are requesting for LiFePO4 usage, I’m currently looking into possible version of using LiFePO4 and NiMH also. But, currently still in development.
February 12, 2018 at 9:01 PM #7887info6ParticipantFor my application even under 10mA is ok for now.
Would be very interested in a LiFePO4 version but also if you are already looking into it LTO support (though there aren’t any chipsets I can find for it yet) would be even better. The cold performance and charge cycling ability of those batteries is super amazing.
Brett
February 13, 2018 at 12:17 PM #7889LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterHi Brett,
Would be very interested in a LiFePO4 version but also if you are already looking into it LTO support (though there aren’t any chipsets I can find for it yet) would be even better. The cold performance and charge cycling ability of those batteries is super amazing.
I did look into LTO too. But, I’m looking at a chip currently that supports Li-Ion/Pol, NiMH and LiFePO4. Unfortunately, LTO support is on another separate chip. To support the 3 battery chemistry above, only some configuration components will be different, That would allow me to use a single design but different components are populated based on different battery chemistry. And yes, LiFePO4 and LTO battery charger are less in the market. And to make things worst, I needed a solar panel input compatible (MPPT) and ultra low current uA range. That makes things harder but I’m working on it.
The driving force behind this decision is definitely temperature as you have mentioned. The number of charge cycle is also way much better than Li-Ion/Pol batteries.
There’s no ETA just yet but samples chip are coming in. So, I’m evaluating….
February 14, 2018 at 10:41 PM #7897info6ParticipantWell if you need a beta tester I would be happy to help out 😉
February 17, 2018 at 12:03 PM #7916info6ParticipantHi Lim,
Is there anyway to disable the green LED when the battery is connected in software?
Brett
February 17, 2018 at 3:18 PM #7919LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterThe green LED (power Good, PG) is controlled the power path management IC BQ24074. We won’t be able to control them on software. The only way is to de-solder the LED current limiting resistor 2.2K R12.
- This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by LIM PHANG MOH.
- This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by LIM PHANG MOH.
- This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by LIM PHANG MOH.
- This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by LIM PHANG MOH.
- This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by LIM PHANG MOH.
- This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by LIM PHANG MOH.
March 29, 2018 at 10:58 AM #8287royParticipantHi Lim,
I would also be very interested in a solution where one could use NiMH batteries or a LiFePO4 battery. Especially the latter. In the regions where we deploy we can’t afford to have issues (fire related) when it comes to batteries so the Lipo’s are a no go. I am also designing shields on top of the board on which I mount battery a holder so a VIN power pin that can use the low power (18mAh) would be a real “wannahave”. On top of that having a solar charge solution for the LiFePO4 batteries would be great.
Please let us know if you made any progress on this. This would be a great improvement on our system.
Cheers,
Roy
March 29, 2018 at 11:05 AM #8289LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterHi Roy,
I’m currently working on it but it will come with an RN2483A/RN2903 instead of the RFM95W to make it easier for mass deployment. Supports Li-Ion/Pol, 2 cell NiMH (not sure whether 3 cell is desired), or LiFePO4 (only 1 configuration at a time). Trying to push down the sleep current consumption at the moment. Board is 4-layer PCB, so there are more work on validating everything. And yes, input is solar compatible so if the sunlight is less, the input voltage will not collapse.
March 29, 2018 at 11:17 AM #8292royParticipantThanks Lim for the update.
That is good news, I will keep track of the progress on your new boards. Please check with the RN2903 if you can make it work in the Malaysian/Indonesian frequency. Although it is advertised as being able to run in the 915mHz range, when I bought them (3 months ago) they came pre-programmed with the US settings and so they don’t work out of the box.
After asking Microchip how to change it, because I couldn’t figure out how to, there wasn’t much in the docs, they said I had to update the firmware and they advised me to write it myself because they had none for AS923. Needless to say I wasn’t happy about this, also because it took them over two weeks to respond to this question. Note that this is for LoraWAN, when using Lora only you can change the frequency.
Long story short, although they look easy to use with the TX/RX build in support. For us costs wise and limitations on software adjustments actually made us abandon our custom build boards around this chip. Hence I moved on and started ordering your boards with the RFM95 chip 🙂
Cheers,
Roy
March 29, 2018 at 11:32 AM #8294LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterThat is good news, I will keep track of the progress on your new boards. Please check with the RN2903 if you can make it work in the Malaysian/Indonesian frequency. Although it is advertised as being able to run in the 915mHz range, when I bought them (3 months ago) they came pre-programmed with the US settings and so they don’t work out of the box.
After asking Microchip how to change it, because I couldn’t figure out how to, there wasn’t much in the docs, they said I had to update the firmware and they advised me to write it myself because they had none for AS923. Needless to say I wasn’t happy about this, also because it took them over two weeks to respond to this question. Note that this is for LoraWAN, when using Lora only you can change the frequency.
Let me check with them on this. I know AS923 support or even AU915 is missing.
Long story short, although they look easy to use with the TX/RX build in support. For us costs wise and limitations on software adjustments actually made us abandon our custom build boards around this chip. Hence I moved on and started ordering your boards with the RFM95 chip 🙂
I still believe people would still want the RFM95W version. As many people run RadioHead library instead of the LoRaWAN LMIC. It won’t be that hard to do a version with the RFM95W. Also I forgot to mention, board will also be able to run on non-rechargeable batteries like 2xAA, 3xAA, CR123A, Li-SOCL2. This will leave user with a wider temperature range and various battery chemistry to select from based on different requirements, cost and scenario.
October 10, 2018 at 9:37 PM #9995sapdemonParticipantHi Lim,
Do you think about changing the MCP1700 (Mini Ultra Pro V3 board) on Buck-Boost regulator e.g TPS63051.
I believe it will be more efficient for using a LiPo. These batteries have a voltage that goes from 4.2V to 2.7V typically during their discharge cycle.And, if I understand, Mini Ultra Pro V3 board would not work if the voltage goes lower than 3.3 v (e.g. 3V).
best regards,
DmytroOctober 11, 2018 at 2:51 PM #10003LIM PHANG MOHKeymasterHi Dmytro,
Do you think about changing the MCP1700 (Mini Ultra Pro V3 board) on Buck-Boost regulator e.g TPS63051.
I believe it will be more efficient for using a LiPo. These batteries have a voltage that goes from 4.2V to 2.7V typically during their discharge cycle.It’s in the work. But I can’t reveal much yet! It’s going to awesome, awesome for everyone’s need.
And, if I understand, Mini Ultra Pro V3 board would not work if the voltage goes lower than 3.3 v (e.g. 3V).
Yes, it won’t unfortunately.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.